Home » Movie » Whats In A Name?

Whats In A Name?

It is difficult to tell whether or not this is a recent trend, but I have noticed it recently.

I know branding is a major part of selling a movie, but this year I have seen three blockbusters, none of which I recognised as being legitimate parts of their respective franchises. By this I mean any of the three films could easily have been done with minor tweaks and no-one would have gone “that’s a blatant rip-off of <insert beloved franchise here>!”

The first time I noticed was with Star Trek Into Darkness. Now, I have a lot of problems with J. J. Abrams in general and the Star Trek reboot in particular. This latest film has completely removed all the things that made the series (and some of the films) really interesting. They dealt with issues and theology and morality. The reboot is just stuff blowing up really fast so as to distract you from the ridiculousness of the plot.

Then there was Iron Man 3, which admittedly due to the specific “suits of iron” make this a little harder to copy, but not by much. Despite this being the 3rd or 4th time I’d seen these characters I didn’t recognise any of them. The biggest problem seemed to be that they had drawn out this distinctly mid 1990s film structure and then forced the characters into it, rather than allowing the characters to develop naturally.

Then there was A Good Day To Die Hard. Boy, oh boy! Whilst the fourth edition had seen our favourite string vest wearing protagonist into some kind of bad ass action hero, rather than the everyday cop of the first three, the fifth one turned it up another notch. Aside from the stupid dialogue, the stupid, weak, stupid plot, and the boring characters, they made him immune to radiation poisoning! If this isn’t a Die Hard movie, it doesn’t get made.

All these films have completely abandoned everything that made them interesting and to make things worse, there will be sequels to all of them.

I am not against sequels and reboots, though there are probably too many, but these films hardly qualify. If you are going to change everything so that it barely resembles what came before, please use a different name.


One thought on “Whats In A Name?

  1. Don’t agree with Star Trek or Iron Man but definitely Die Hard. I think the time between the movies has watered-down what made these films Die Hard movies. Above anything else, the main thing Die Hard 5 lacked was John McClane. I don’t know who Willis was playing, but it wasn’t the same guy from the first movie.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s